Free Webinar

Are Short Sales the BIG Solution?

by The KCM Crew on January 11, 2011 · 8 comments

  • Comment
  • Email
  • Print
  • Comment
  • Email
  • Print

Our blog yesterday discussed the challenge that banks are facing in their attempt to complete foreclosures. Some courts are attempting to void the foreclosure if the bank did not properly transfer the mortgage from one bank to another. The courts are claiming that, if you didn’t ‘legally’ transfer ownership of the loan documents, then you don’t ‘legally’ own it. If you don’t own the debt instruments, you can’t foreclose on them. What does this mean to banks when they handle future foreclosures?

One possibility is that banks may start favoring ‘short sales’ over foreclosures in more cases. The ‘short sale’ option has already been gaining momentum. The OCC and OTS Mortgage Metrics Report shows foreclosures are up 57.5 % year over year; ‘short sales’ are up 82.9%.

Now, with courts scrutinizing the foreclosure process, it may make more sense for banks to work with the current homeowner to sell the home even if it is at a price less than the amount owed on the mortgage. Adding to this possibility is that banks could lose less in a ‘short sale’ than a foreclosure. A ‘short sale’ sells for 81% of what a similar, non-distressed property would sell. A foreclosure sells for 59% of full value.

In the past, banks weren’t concerned with the difference because mortgage insurance companies had the legal requirement to cover the majority of the additional loss. However, insurance companies are now fighting these payments claiming that the original mortgage application might have been fraduantly written. This all adds up to the liklihood that banks will look more favorably at the ‘short sale’ process.

To this point, an article in Housing Wire quoted John Vella, the chief operating officer at technology provider Equator:

“Investors usually see a 20% to 30% better execution on a short sale versus an REO sale when it comes to loss severity. With the foreclosure volume, current and pending REO inventories, servicers will be pressed to do more short sales in 2011…they could see an increase of at least 25% over 2010 in completed short sales.”

Bottom Line

For the reasons mentioned above, the banks will probably lean more toward ‘short sales’. If you are a homeowner not able to pay your mortgage, this may be a much better option then allowing the home to go to foreclosure.

Share

Free Webinar

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Are Short Sales the BIG Solution? -- Topsy.com

  • Steve Early

    While short sales may be up, we could be doing a lot more of them. There are two significant problems with short sales:

    1) They take FAR too long for the servicer to process them. Buyers don’t want to wait 3-4 months to see if their offer MIGHT be accepted. Every time a buyer walks, you essentially start over because the valuations expire (BPOs are typically valid for a maximum of 90 days). We have had short sales take over two years as buyer after buyer gets impatient and walks away.
    2) Servicers and Investors are often coming up with valuations that are not in synch with local property values. One case in point; the investor wanted $270,000 for a property with an offer of $248,000 and wouldn’t budge. Every reasonable piece of data was presented to the investor to show why the offer was reasonable. The property originally sold for $270,000 in 2006, so the investor is basically saying has been depreciation in value on this property since it was last purchased? Hogwash!

    While logic would say that they are better of doing a short sale, we see a lot of properties go to auction that never stood a chance because of the time and value constraints above. It’s almost as if they would PREFER to foreclose.

    BTW – doing a short sale doesn’t remove an MI company from the mix. MI companies are still very much a part of the decision process when a short sale is approved and will often demand sellers bring cash to closing (sometimes significant amounts), sign promissory notes or both if they think the seller has the ability to pay.

  • http://isellwrightcounty.com D E Nelson

    What you are saying seems to possibly be true, as the servicing companies earn their income from fee’s and are many times an arm of the bank holding the mortgage, the only way to get fee for service pay is to run the process as long as possible and let the property go through foreclosure/sheriffs sale then REO it to gain the most $$’s in fees possible..

  • http://www.AbundantHomeInspection.com Simone Cartwright

    This is a very informative and needed blog post. I’ve had clients call to schedule home inspections for homes under short sale and it may have taken 6-9 months before they where accepted.

  • Jeff

    Question, if the bank can’t foreclose because they cannot produce the note how can title be transfered properly in a short sale?

  • Bonnie Johnston

    A better choice for the owner.

  • http://www.JaneFoster.com Jane Foster

    Short sales are definitely the way to go but banks are in the business of making loans, they are not in the business of taking homes back, so the only way short sales could really work, is if the banks have a streamlined, realistic time frame and a professionaly way of doing this and so far that has not happened so the stress of short sales and the long time frames will continue.

  • Pingback: *ARE SHORT SALES THE BIG SOLUTION? « Short Sale Chicago

Previous post:

Next post: